羊脂球读后感600字（一）

《羊脂球》的诞生，使莫泊桑一鸣惊人，这不仅是莫泊桑的处女作，更是他的成名作、代表作。我是在高中的语文课里学习了莫泊桑的短篇小说《项链》。从而认识了这位并列于契诃夫和鲁迅的世界短篇小说之王。他与巴尔扎克同样生长于19世纪的法国，一生创作了近300篇短篇小说和六部长篇小说。

小说描绘了一八七零年普法战争期间，有一辆法国的驿车在离开敌战区时，被一名普鲁士军官扣留。军官一定要车上一个绰号叫羊指球的妓女陪他过夜，否则驿车就不能通过。羊脂球出于爱国心断然拒绝，可是和他同车的有身份的乘客为了各自私利，逼她为了大家而牺牲自己，羊脂球出于无奈而作了让步。可当第二天早上驿车出发时，那些昨天还苦苦哀求的乘客们却突然换了一幅嘴脸，个个疏远她，不屑再与她讲话。

作者用一个不愿委身侵略者、地位卑微的妓女和当时一些上层人士作对比；作者以经过关卡前羊脂球把提篮里的东西拿出来与大家一起分享和经过关卡后他们对她的不屑一顾作鲜明对比。

读完《羊脂球》的第一感觉，就是为羊脂球叫不平。仔细想想，这更与当时的法兰西第三共和国社会背景有关。资本主义法国人与人之间的地位隔阂、建立在金钱上的虚伪友谊和亲密，在作者笔下被淋漓尽致地体现出来。

今年是莫泊桑诞辰一百五十周年之际，他的文学成就仅次于欧洲19世纪末自然主义流派的左拉。读莫泊桑的作品，尤如欣赏一段历史，人物的真、善、美几乎荡然无存，一切都受金钱、权位、名誉的支配，社会腐败不堪。这对人是一种精神上的启迪，对社会则暗示下一个时代的到来。

羊脂球读后感600字（二）

莫泊桑生于19世纪的法国，一生创作了短篇小说近300篇，他是与契诃夫和欧·亨利并列的世界短篇小说之王。《羊脂球》是他的代表作。

小说描绘了一八七零年普法战争期间，有一辆法国马车在离开敌战区时，被一名普鲁士军官扣留。军官一定要车上一个绰号叫羊脂球的妓女陪他过夜，否则马车就不能通过。羊脂球出于爱国心断然拒绝，可是和她同车的有身份的乘客为了各自私利，逼她为了大家而牺牲自己，羊脂球出于无奈而作了让步。可当第二天早上马车出发时，那些昨天还苦苦哀求的乘客们却突然换了一副嘴脸，个个疏远她，不屑再与她讲话。她觉得自己被这些顾爱名誉的混帐东西轻视淹没了，当初，他们牺牲她，之后又把她当作一件肮脏的废物扔掉。

当一个人有利用价值的时候，他们会把你伺候得像皇帝，这就是贵族的价值观，他们自私贪婪的本性只允许他们用金钱去衡量一切。书本的学识未能给他们带来善心。现实中赤裸裸的金钱交易、残酷的争名夺利冲刷了一切形为上的终极关怀。这在后文中显露无疑。

莫泊桑的这则故事恰恰以羊脂球的悲惨遭遇反衬了资本主义下的丑恶肮脏的灵魂。他们虚伪的面具下藏的都是腐朽的内脏和污秽的思想。

作者用一个不愿委身侵略者、地位卑微的妓女和当时一些上层人士作对比：作者以过关卡前羊脂球把提篮里的东西拿出来与大家一起分享和经过关卡后他们对她的不屑一顾作鲜明对比。这些是在实处的对照，另外也是对爱国方式的对比。读完《羊脂球》的第一感觉，就是为羊脂球叫不平。仔细想想，这更是与当时的法兰西第三共和国社会背景有关。在资本主义统治下法国人与人间的地位隔阂、建立在金钱上的虚伪友谊和亲密，在作者笔下被淋漓尽致地体现出来。

羊脂球读后感600字（三）

最近正在研究《莫泊桑短篇小说的艺术特色》。莫泊桑，法国十九世纪末的批判现实主义作家，一生写了六部长篇小说和356篇短篇小说，被世人誊为“世界短篇小说之王”。今天刚读完他的第一篇短篇小说《羊脂球》。

小说写在普法战争年代，法国战败，一些社会各个阶层的人同坐在一个车里，准备逃跑。小说里的主人公羊脂球是名妓女，属于社会的最低阶层，是受到唾弃和背负耻辱的人群。她们的存在似乎代表了人类的堕落，社会的黑暗。

这种身份，不但受到“同车人”的蔑视，包括她自己都为自己的身份羞愧不已。()当那些傲慢的老爷，太太们由于匆忙出逃而忘记准备食物，饿得饥肠辘辘之时，善良的羊脂球竟然“低声下气”地请求他们吃自己丰美的食物。

羊脂球的天性是善良的，她不忍看到别人的悲惨境遇，反而以德报怨，不计前嫌。读到这里，我被深深地触动了。

小说通篇没有描述过羊脂球的心理活动，她的喜与乐，哀与愁，快乐与欣慰，委屈与愤怒都是通过她的一举一动展现在读者面前。作者似乎已经不需要她再表白什么，但是她的一切感受，我们已经深深感悟到。

作者成功运用了一系列对比的方法。他没有直接告诉我们羊脂球这个形象是美与丑，可是我们对于她的美丽，善良却体会深刻。为什么呢？因为作者在美丽善良的羊脂球周围刻画了一群丑陋粗鄙的人。他们虽然有着崇高的社会地位，却有着和他们的地位成反比的肮脏的灵魂。同样是普法战争的受害者，人和人之间的差别怎么会那么悬殊？平时一本正经甚至受人尊敬的人，在灾难面前显露出无耻的面孔，而在社会上没有地位和尊严的人却表现的无私善良。往往使我们在受到震撼之余，更加记住这位热爱祖国，热爱人民，热爱和平的伟大作家。虽然，在作品里，他常常将人生的丑恶，阴郁的部分拿出来，把它剥析的流血不止，甚至令人望而生畏。但他却让我们看到更加真实的，重新再现的人生。

莫泊桑对于自己创作上的总结，很好的体现了他在写作上的“隐藏”技巧。就象一幅图画，当画面上的一片景色或者一个人物出现时，我们往住从一片嫩绿的叶子就可以推断出是春天的景致，从一个人物的穿着和气质就可以看出他的身份地位。只有那些平庸的画家，才会选择去用一片森林来体现春天，用一整群人的特征来衬托所要体现的人物。也许，这就是伟大的艺术家和普通作家的不同之处吧。

羊脂球英语读后感

guy de maupassant（1850——1893）， one of the greatest critical realist writers in the world, is considered as one of three “kings of world short story”。 maupassant created six novels and 359 medium forms during his brief lifetime, engendering a momentous effect on the later literature. and it’s his maiden work, suet ball that won him world-wide prestige.

in1870, with the outbreak of the franco-prussian war, the real-based story suet ball happened. the heroine of the story is a humble harlot called suet ball. with a group of french residents of rouen, recently occupied by the prussian army, the 11 travelers are on their way fleeing to le havre in a stagecoach. in virtue of the appalling weather, the stagecoach moves rather slowly and has just covered a few miles by midday. initially, those occupants snub suet ball whereas their attitudes alters with the emergence of a basket filled with scrumptious food and she caters for those hungry travelers selflessly.

the carriage doesn’t stop until they blunders into a prussian-held territory called t?tes. a prussian officer detains the coach with no definite reasons. in the next two days, the occupants wait with barely concealed impatience and eventually suet ball tells that they will be detained perpetually unless she approves of sleeping with the officer. out of her patriotism, suet ball gives him a point-blank refusal. as it should be, those travelers behave furiously to the officer's arrogance while during the next two days, they exemplify logic and morality in diverse ways to convince suet ball of its validity. what a kind-hearted girl! finally suet ball gives up and sacrifices her body for everyone’s freedom.

the next morning, they are permitted to leave. but those 'representatives of virtue' totally neglect suet ball, casting scathing sights on the poor young woman while even disdaining talking to her and rejecting sharing their food with her in the same way that she did at the beginning. from their perspectives, suet ball turns out to be no more utilizable and should be condemned for her “ashamed” conduct. as the stagecoach travels deeper into the night, she seethes with rage against those hypocrites, and ultimately weeps for her lost dignity.

in this story, maupassant highlighted the intense comparison between suet ball and the so-called nobles. rapacity, hypocrisy, sexuality and nobility intertwine in the spotlight，eulogizing the underclass’ patriotism and lampooning the sham of the aristocracy. maupassant portrays the inhabitants of the stagecoach in varied disparaging ways. the most luminous character belongs to the two nuns. at first they are portrayed as tranquil and subservient to lord and demonstrate their fiery patriotic desire to dedicate to their motherland rather than a sordid intention like the other passengers: the nuns profess to haste to a military hospital to heal the wounded french soldiers, hence presenting the argument towards instigating suet ball to abandon her resistance. how absurd it is! nuns are supposed to take strait vows and treat others benevolently. they fill suet ball's head with arguments, arguing that it is not morally wrong to sleep with the officer in order to let the travelers leave, and that the longer she waits, the more young french soldiers will die as the nuns are not there to look after them. superficially, they claim that it is for the good of the country but indeed they’re just taking advantage of her. suet ball's resistance to the officer's sexual advances again indicate her patriotism. cruel wars have stripped all the external stuffs. in contrast to all of these is suet ball, a prostitute, revealed to be the most fiercely patriotic, virtuous, and morally admirable character, which maupassant contrasts with the hypocrisy and snobbery of the others.

it is arguably maupassant’s most famous short story. the carriage constitutes a microcosm of french society as a whole. and the narrative techniques of this story are rather sophisticated and carefully conceived. on balance, a real noble person like suet ball can’t be judged by the appearance or the occupation, his/ her moral quality will glitter when confronting the real ordeal. consequently, i deem that suet ball is worth reading lingeringly, savoring every word.

羊脂球英文读后感

i’m reading a book named suet ball, which was written by maupassant, one of the greatest critical realist writers in the world.

he created hundreds of short stories and six novels during his short

lifetime. as we all know, he is famous for his short stories, especially the story suet ball which won him great reputation around the world.

suet ball was based on a true story happened at the war between french and prussia. this novel tells the sad story of a harlot called suet ball. with several noble french on the carriage, she was on the way leaving her city for her at the point of killing a prussia soldier.

though she was looked down by these people, she was selfless to share her food with them. unfortunately, they were detained by a prussia officer. the officer didn’t let them go unless suet ball agree to sleep with him for one night. at first, she was determined to refuse his unreasonable request. however, these noble people were so selfish that they instigated her to say yes to him, thoroughly giving up their patriotism. so this kind-hearted girl took their advice, selling her body to get in their freedom in return. to our surprise, when the pitiful girl needed food and drink after the torment, nobody among them gave a hand to her and they even ruthlessly condemned her “shameful” conduct. suet ball had no choice but to hug herself tightly, sobbing.

there is no doubt that these so-called nobles were selfish and greedy, for they only cared about themselves and wealth. when something or somebody is useless, they will abandon them without hesitation, such as suet ball. on the contrast, suet ball, one of the lower class, behaved like a real noble person. she not only gave food to these ugly people but also sell her body for their freedom. the most important thing was that she refused to sleep with the enemy because she regarded it as a betrayal to her motherland. she kept her conscience all the time while others had lost it in cruel wars. she was born in slush but her heart was pure.

in my opinion, these people were lousy, and the two nuns were disgusting. since they were the symbol of god, they should treat everyone equally. nevertheless, when suet ball was in need of help, they just hid themselves and looked on her coldly. although a few days ago they also took in her tasty food and fragrant wine. they had totally abandoned their duty and opened the door to help others who were in straits.

we can see from the story that everyone is stark-naked in front of wars. don’t judge one person by his or her appearance or position. cruel wars will strip all the external stuffs. those so-called noble people were actually mean. however, suet ball, a harlot, showed her patriotism and remained faithful and unyielding.

i think the author wanted to sing the praises of the courage to resist the enemies and the emotion of patriotism through the character-suet ball. and because of his successful describe, suet ball has become an well-known symbol for her faith and patriotism.

in conclusion, this short story is worth reading nowadays, because we will learn to be brave and perseverance.

羊脂球读后感

莫泊桑是法国十九世纪着名的小说家，被誉为短篇小说大王。他写得《羊脂球》使他一举成名。

《羊脂球》讲的大概是这样一个故事：普法战争期间，一名绰号羊脂球的妓女与其他几位社会的上层人士同乘一辆马车逃离法国。起初那些人都嫌弃羊脂球低贱的身份而不屑与她交谈，后来迫于饥饿也就厚着脸皮接受羊脂球的食物。但在途中，马车遭遇普鲁士军官拦截且那名军官要求羊脂球委身于他，羊脂球出于爱国情怀，毅然拒绝了几次，军官恼羞成怒，扣下所有人当人质。那几位上层人士知道马车不能离开的原因后，对她这个下贱的女人越发地憎恶。对羊脂球进行百般劝说，他们对羊脂球的行为嗤之以鼻：本来不就是做这种事的嘛！无奈之下，羊脂球只得答应。但事情过后，众人立刻换了副嘴脸，对羊脂球不闻不问。在途中也没有分享给羊脂球食物，羊脂球气愤地说不出话来，小说在羊脂球的呜咽声中结束。

羊脂球就那样地被那些道貌岸然的人当成牺牲品送给敌军换取自由，然后又像仍一件肮脏无用的东西一样扔掉。读完后的感觉就是为羊脂球抱不平，对那些所谓的上层人士的愤恨。难道妓女就没有尊严吗？而那些名人雅士又真的高尚到哪里呢？是恬不知耻地吃光人家的食物，却又在人家饥饿时视而不见，是为了马车能够通行却肆意践踏一个女子的尊严！

相反，我倒认为那些人才是真正的肮脏、低贱！当他们点头哈腰地对待敌军却对自己的同胞冷嘲热讽时，我想，他们的灵魂一定肮脏到了极致！更为讽刺地是，马车上的两个修女，自诩为随军作战的好修女，却是直接导致羊脂球作出令人羞耻决定的刽子手！

莫泊桑用一个身份低贱的妓女与上层人士做对比，反衬出那些人虚伪、丑陋的本质，揭露了当时资本主义人与人关系是建立在金钱地位上的虚伪的友谊和亲密。也难怪《羊脂球》的一鸣惊人了。

人人生而平等，无论是何等身份地位的人，都不应随意去践踏其尊严，他们的爱国热情并不见得会比高尚人士的少，我们不能根据职业来判定或看轻一个人。