爱玛英文读后感（一）

emma–the fourth, longest and last of jane austen’s books to appear in print during her lifetime, emma is considered a classic romantic comedy and was first published in 1816. written almost 200 year ago, it’s inevitable that the dialogue may feel a bit stilted at times. however, this adds dimension and depth to the story which focuses on 19th century social hierarchies and the interaction between various social classes.

miss emma woodhouse is a shining example of a 19th century socialite. beautiful, clever and wealthy, she fancies herself a master-matchmaker and sets in motion a laundry list of schemes to pair off the highbury residents. convinced a make-over would elevate her new friend harriet’s social standing and thus her marriage potential, emma, fueled by her feeling of superiority, plotted and planned, all to no avail. failing to realize the extent of her shortcomings and the consequences of such hurtful behavior, emma was finally confronted by mr. knightley. afterwards, embarrassed and ashamed, she reevaluated her life and began to make amends, in hopes of becoming a better person.

emma is a beautifully written, classic, laced with wit and sarcasm. through a vastly differing cast of characters, each delightfully inspiring in his or her own way, austen vividly captured the heart of a community. everything is neatly tied up at the conclusion, as things literally come full circle…ending much the way it began. a sublte, yet very significant messege is hidden just below the surface–the beginning and the ending are just definitive points in the journey, in between is where we write our definition of happiness. there’s a depth and sincere honesty written into the very fabric of this story- that must be recognized to fully appreciate the artistic genius of jane austen.like a vintage automobile, emma is a slow, leisurely read, perfect for a lazy sunday afternoon.

爱玛英文读后感（二）

the vampire story is a well tried and tested plot line. the undead feeding on the blood of the living, and in so doing turning their victims into vampires as well. great plot, but it has one flaw. the usual scoop involves a vampire needing to drink blood every night. i live in a small town of around 20,000 residents, some simple math shows that within two weeks, we would all be vampires, in fact within ten weeks every person in the continental us would be a vampire, and a few weeks later the entire world!

that said, i have no problem with vampire related books. predatoress is set in modern times, actually 2003 and most of the activity takes place in the small hungarian town of sopron. for the main character the author has selected herself, emma gabor. emma is a sweet 18 year old girl with a promising future as a genetic researcher. ()those aspirations seem dashed following a close encounter with a shadowy figure who introduces emma into the world of the undead.

emma in turn co-opts her friends. of course the small population of sopron can not possibly sustain this ever expanding vampire population, and the young ladies are forced to forage further afield.

as with any secret, it has a finite shelf life, a sell by date! it does not take long before the activities in sopron become noticed.

emma is not inherently bad, she just can not control the need for fresh blood. eventually she explains her dilemma to her fiancée  zoltan, another genetic researcher.

the race is on, can they discover a serum to undo the vampire curse?

i don’t think it would be fair to readers to reveal more of the plot.

as an older reader i left with the feeling that this book lacked the finesse bram stoker’s classic 1897 horror novel dracula. but, the genre is not one that i have a great love for anyway, so i would not take my word for much. in fact my 18 year old step son and his girlfriend are huge fans of this genre, it will be interesting to get their feedback.

almost certainly the young adult audience is the focus of emma gabor, and it may well work for her.

from a technical standpoint i cannot fault the book. it has been well crafted, and great care taken in the editing phase. i suspect that emma gabor is going to become a name with a large following. it will be interesting to see what direction she takes next. the ya crowd is a large and influential group, and they are often willing to trade depth for action in a plot. i however think that if the author swaps action for depth in her next book, she will be well on the way to that elusive pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. predatoress is a clear example of emma gabor’s ability to write, she just needs to limit the sweeping plot-line in favor of developing her characters.

书虫读后感英文（一）

in the winter holiday.i read a book.it is very wonderful.it's name is "the monkey's paw".the book tells about the whites and a  paw's story.mr.white's friend gave him a small and dirty paw.he said "it can makes your dreams come true.but you'll feel unhappy."mr.white wanted ?3000.and after some days,he got  ?3000,but his son deid.the end is mr.white and his wife were very sad.

i think “the monkey's paw” is very useful.because it tells us some important things.such as "get something for nothing." is impossible.we must do every things by ourselves.and we must know learn by doing.

when i was 10 years old.i was not good at math.and i had tried to find many escape solutions.but no one is  good for me.my mother tolds me,"learn by doing",and i did some test questions.now,my math is ok.i think my story likes "the monkey's paw".and in the new future,i will do every things by my self and do not rely on my father and mother.i know i am the best.

what a nice story!“the monkey's paw”is perfect，and i will learn more and more in it.

书虫读后感英文（二）

this winter vacation,i read agreat book《bookworm》。in gread 1,i appreciate the beauty of the moon,and,i know mary,queen of socts's story……in a word,ibenefited a lot of in it.i really like this book.

among them,my favourite book is《love or money》。it tells a rich women death without.everyone is suspect,and they greeted her moneys mouth water.her little daughter threatens her,to obtain money;on the surface seems to love her big daughter to reasons but hater mother;her son to a piece of land and mother fell out……

results a murderer is her big daughter!reason have

to her the person i love ！

i was very sad.a girl,actually killed her mother,is really too not filial piety.i know people for a variety of reasons will kill your most close.so,we should control oneself,avoid incentive,not reckless things……

the《book worm》 has taught me a lot.

英文简爱读后感

this is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

it seems to me that many readers’ english reading experience starts with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we refer to the movie “jane eyer”， it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

jane eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. since jane’s education in lowwood orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. the suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, jane got a chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made the acquaintance of lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: after jane and rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally got a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, jane chose to stay with him forever.

i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard jane’s words “never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” （by forrest gump’s mother, in the film “forrest gump”）

what’s more, this film didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation? the film gives the answer tentatively: jane eventually got back to rochester. in fact, when jane met rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant rochester would get retrieval because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. after it, rochester got the mercy of the god and the love of the woman whom he loved. here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. the value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

爱玛读后感（一）

《爱玛》中的两个重要男女主人公是爱玛和奈特利先生。他们两人在许多场合都以自己的方式帮助别人。爱玛为女子做媒的方式十分可笑，甚至还有些荒诞，它竭力为地位低下的女子寻找社会地位比较高的配偶，常常是她自己蒙在鼓里，结果与她的愿望恰恰相反，闹出许多始料所不及的笑话。我们或许可以认为，作者这样处理，正是希望引导读者嘲笑当时英国社会上那种普遍的恶习。奈特利先生则一另外的方式帮助别人，譬如在一次舞会上，他看见社会地位低下的哈利特受到轻蔑的冷遇是，自己挺身而出，维护她的自尊心，协助她度过难堪局面，对馅上欺下的恶劣行径进行打击；他重视哈利特与其地位相称的马丁之间的真情相爱，并给与恰当的协助，使他们有机会按照自己的愿望喜结良缘。作者始终将奈特利先生这一角色置于比较让读者崇拜的地位，无疑希望通过这一人物体现自己一定的社会理想。

《爱玛》没有惊险骇人的情节，也没有耸人听闻的描述，但是从它娓娓道来、令人陶醉的叙述中，在他谜一般的情节中，在他对人物性格和心理的细致入微的刻画中，读者面前仿佛展开一幅优美而略带夸张的生动画卷。我们好像能看到故事中人物的形象和行为，能听到他们在各种背景下进行的交谈，能感觉到人物的喜悦和忧愁，当时英国社会的林林总总仿佛由读者亲身所经历。

爱玛读后感（二）

《爱玛》是简·奥斯汀的作品。奥斯汀小说结构并不宏大，但作品中每一个人物都栩栩如生真实可信。他们或小气或大度或势利或坦荡或卑微都被刻画得淋漓尽致，即使过去了二百多年，这些人物似乎依然活在当下并且鲜艳夺目，这是简·奥斯汀小说的魅力，相比《情感与理智》，《爱玛》中的人物更加饱满与可亲。

爱玛是一个上流社会未婚女子，她具有强烈的门第观念，不需要正当职业，业余爱好是做媒，谁尊贵谁卑微谁与谁能配成一对儿，她拿着心中的那杆封建大秤在每一桩事上每一件服饰装扮上每一个眼神顾盼间都要称上一称，谁与谁份量相等，谁与谁悬殊太大，整一个势利妇女却正当妙龄也不缺善良与同情心。她发誓自个儿绝不嫁人，理由是要服侍年老体弱的父亲，其实是海的里男人没一个配得上他。

《爱玛》主要讲述三个女人的故事，爱玛、琪恩和海丽埃。爱玛和琪恩年龄相当，都美貌如花才情横溢，相比较而言，琪恩更具才气，这个贫穷人家的女儿被寄养在上流社会家庭里，养尊处优中练就了优雅高贵的品性，待到谈婚论嫁时琪恩显然已有高不成低不就尴尬趋势。爱玛有时候羡慕她的品行妒嫉她的才情，有时候轻看她的出身与贫困。爱玛习惯俯视琪恩，却隐隐有倾佩之情，琪恩的人格魅力不在爱玛之下，她们也有惺惺相惜之情，却始终保持距离，这是穷与富的差距，世俗的眼光和心理是不可避免的。

海丽埃乏善可陈，不是出身名门是个弃儿，相貌中等偏上，爱玛一心想把她调教成琪恩这样的可人，并极力物色上流社会的绅士，欲成就百年之好，可惜海丽埃智商一般才情欠缺，没有哪个绅士看好海丽埃，爱玛欲将海丽埃嫁入上流社会的梦想一而再再而三地被破灭，最终弄明白那不过是一厢情愿。门第观念坚如磐石，聪慧的琪恩有幸挪开磐石嫁入豪门，而资质一般的海丽埃即使善良贤惠却始终欲嫁无门。想起海丽诺不禁让人暗然神伤，如果在当时她有二万磅作陪嫁，嫁个绅士是举手之劳，比她更平凡更庸俗的艾而顿太太就是一个明证。

门当户对，即使在当今，依旧根深蒂固也难被冲破。爱玛理所当然要嫁给大户人家，这个没有悬念。

爱玛读后感（三）

《爱玛》是英国着名女作家简·奥斯丁的第五部小说，写作技巧已是炉火纯青，此书和奥斯丁的其他作品一样着墨与凡人琐事，场景情节多比较平淡，却似乎有种魔力，吸引读者不断地融入书中的氛围，直到读到结尾才能罢休。这本书我在初中的时候就读了，最近又重温了一次。

这部小说也是围绕着女主人公的择偶活动展开，奥斯丁以女性细致而敏感的角度，着力揭示出当时英国社会潮流中，以婚配作为女子寻求经济保障、提高经济地位的恶习，重门第而不顾女子感情和做人权利的丑陋时尚。文中描写了几对年青男女的爱情，以谜一样的故事，娓娓道来，更是耐人寻味。奥斯丁通过对人物的外貌，语言，动作和神态，使人物栩栩如生，呈现在读者眼前的是一场场精彩的舞台剧。

《爱玛》这个故事是发生在一个英格兰乡村和邻近地区中产阶级的生活中，这里的人们熟悉对方，就像我们中国的村庄一样。但是与中国的习俗不同的是，英国人的社会等级观念比较强，普遍认为：贵族或者是社会比较上层阶级的人们不应该与下层阶级的人交往，他们认为这样会有失身份；尤其是结婚问题，如果一个有一定社会地位的男士与一位没有家庭背景的女士两情相悦，甚至达到谈婚论嫁时，这肯定是受到其他人的鄙视和侮辱，成为人们茶余饭后的笑柄。

《爱玛》中的主要女性角色均追求与男子思想感情的平等交流与沟通，要求社会地位上的平等权利，坚持独立观察、分析和选择男子的自由。这或许在我们现在看来没什么了不起，但是在当时的英国社会确实一大步的进展，尤其是女主角爱玛·伍德豪斯更是最特出的例子。此书是站在爱玛的角度思考问题，让我感觉到这女子是如此的与众不同。她相貌端庄，聪明开朗，生长在富贵家庭。()她并没有想过嫁人，甚至还说：以后都不嫁人。甚至做起红娘，为她的好朋友哈丽特·史密斯小姐做媒，她竭力为地位地下的女子寻找社会地位比较高的配偶，但结果往往与她预料中的不一样，闹出许多始料不及的笑话。

爱玛是个聪明的女孩子，但是她并不是完美的，她的缺点是过分自行其是，稍稍自负。每当奈特丽先生指出她观点中的不妥处，或许是对某人的评价与她不同时，她不会立刻检讨自己，甚至一意孤行，但到最后结果出来和她预想中不同时，她总会深思、总结自己的错误。

爱玛同样以自己方式帮助别人的是书中的主要男主角，奈特利先生。奈特利先生我认为是在全书中最为明智的一个人物。奥斯丁把奈特利放在最清醒的地位，用他的语言指出她认为的社会的恶习。他对于那个“认为自己所作所为并不感到悔恨，依然认为自己在判断女性权利和女子的微妙心理方面比他能力强”的爱玛是包容的。又如，在一次舞会上，看到社会地位低下的哈丽特·史密斯小姐受到轻蔑的冷遇时，他挺身而出，协助她度过难堪局面，对谄上欺下的行为进行打击。与爱玛相反的是，他鼓励地位相符的哈丽特和罗伯特·马丁之间的真情相爱，便给予一定的帮助，让有情人终成眷属。奈特利先生是在本书中我比较喜欢的角色之一。有两位性格如此鲜明的男女主角，让《爱玛》増添不少。

让我们细细体会一下：首先是爱玛和奈特利先生的爱情，这一对是最后才揭露出来，在前面的书本中并没有太多的笔墨描写，他们是如何有感觉的。之前我以前以为，奈特利先生对爱玛只是长辈对晚辈的感觉，因为他比她大整整16年。虽然说爱情是不能用年龄来衡量，但是16年这个数字在我的脑海里已经深深地留下烙印。再加上弗兰克·邱吉尔的伪爱情烟幕，让我认为最后走在一起应该是爱玛和弗兰克·邱吉尔。然而我们太看少爱玛，太看少时间，时间足以让一个人看清楚一个人，时间足以让所谓的暧昧消失。最后的爱玛的自我心里的剖解，和奈特利先生的坚持，让我们的有情人终成眷属。这一切却是意料之外，情理之中啊。让读者更开心的是，爱玛不用离开怕离别的伍德豪斯先生，也可以和她的爱人快快乐乐地生活在一起，这也是《爱玛》中最幸福的一对。

奥斯丁一生中从来没有结过婚，却给我们带了这样如此不同的爱情故事。让我们在享受文字的同时，不禁思索着：男女平等的权利是人们伟大的智慧结晶。这一部名着正是对当时英国社会反抗的无声呐喊。无数的文字形成一把把锋利的剑，刺向社会的弊端，这就是无论那个文人与生俱来的神圣的职责。