简爱精彩片段读后感（一）

在我的心目中，《简·爱》是一部感人的作品，因为它使我懂得了什么是善恶美丑，学会了怎样做人，而书中的主人公简·爱就是我学习的榜样，她的聪明、善良、坚强、有主见，是最令人敬佩的。简·爱的一生悲欢离合。她遭遇了许多挫折和坎坷，可以说是不幸的，但是她却从不向命运低头，任何困难在她面前都会感到恐惧。

简·爱是个孤女，出生于一个穷牧师家庭。父母由于染上伤寒，在一个月之中相继去世。幼小的简寄养在舅父母家里。舅父里德先生去世后，简过了几年受排挤和虐待的生活。

简·爱从小被她的舅妈收养，受尽了她的虐待。而且她舅舅的儿子约翰里德还是一个又胖又大、蛮横无理、猪狗不如的禽兽。他经常无缘无故地打骂简·爱，但她的舅妈不但不去制止，反而支持她野蛮的儿子。

我看看简爱的生活，再看看我们的生活，简直不敢相信，现在的小孩全是依赖父母，这让我更加佩服简爱，她坚强，她和命运做斗争。

简爱精彩片段读后感（二）

在我心目中，《简爱》是一部完美而伟大的着作，因为他是我懂得了什么是善恶美丑学会了怎样做人，而书中的主人公简爱就是我的榜样，他的聪明，善良，坚强，有主见，是最令人敬佩的

简爱的一生悲欢离合；他遭遇了许多挫折和坎坷，可以说是不幸的，但是他却从不同命运低头，任何困难在他面前都会感到恐惧。

简爱从小被他的舅妈收养，受尽了他的虐待，而且他舅舅的儿子约翰里德还是一个又胖又大，蛮横无理，猪狗不如的禽兽，他经常无缘无故地打骂简爱，但他的舅妈不但不去制止，反而支持他野蛮的儿子，然而，简爱是一个顽强，决不向恶势力低头的人，她再也忍受不了了，他对约翰的恨压倒了他对他的畏惧，不顾一切地跟他对打起来，当然，结果可想而知，简爱收到了他舅妈的惩罚。

但是海伦彭斯，他的观点与简爱是截然不同的，海伦主张凡事能忍就忍，但是他的宽容，忍让以及他那博大的胸怀，是令人敬佩的，我们无需去评价他的话，至少我们应从中悟出些什么，我很喜欢海伦的一句话“我觉得生命太短促的，不值得把它花费在怀恨和记仇上。”只我们每人都能记住它，多多去理解别人，体谅别人，关心别人，多看到一些美好的景物，乐观地对待生活，我们的生活中一定会充满阳光。

我读完以后知道了，脚下的路不会一直平坦，人的一生不会一帆风顺，只有勇敢面对困难和挫折，才能克服它，战胜它，最终达到成功的彼岸。

简爱精彩片段读后感（三）

在读《简爱》这本书时我就被这句话深深的打动了。“难道就因为我一贫如洗，默默无闻，长相平庸，个子瘦小，就没有灵魂，没有心肠了——你想错了，我的心灵跟你一样丰富，我的心胸一样充实！”

《简爱》的作者夏洛蒂·勃郎特是位崇尚自由独立的新实际女性。《简爱》是英国文学史上的一部经典传世之作，它成功地塑造了英国文学史中第一个对爱情、生活、社会以及宗教都采取了独立自主的积极进取态度和敢于斗争、敢于争取自由平等地位的女性形象。大凡喜爱外国文学作品的女性，都喜欢读夏洛蒂的《简爱》。如果仅仅认为夏洛蒂为写缠绵的爱情而写《简爱》，那你就错了。夏洛蒂笔下的简爱性格倔强，个性独立留给我们的不仅仅是感动。她给我们的还有震撼。所以她是成功的。()

简爱已作为独立女性的经典，我希望无论在阳光下，还是在鲜花里都有更多的简爱走出来，不管是贫穷，还是富有；不管是美貌，还是相貌平庸，都有美好的心灵和充实的心胸，都能以独立的人格和坚强的个性面对不同得人生。

简爱读后感英语

jane eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. after we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, jane eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:

we remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.

we remember her pursuit of justice. it’s like a companion with the goodness. but still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.

we remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. in her opinion, everyone is the same at the god’s feet. though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.

we also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…

when we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.

actually, she wasn’t pretty, and of course, the ordinary appearance didn’t make others feel good of her, even her own aunt felt disgusted with it. and some others even thought that she was easy to look down on and to tease, so when miss ingram met jane eyre, she seemed quite contemptuous, for that she was obviously much more prettier than ‘the plain and ugly governess’. but as the little governess had said: ‘do you think, because i am poor, obscure, plain, and little, i am soulless and heartless? you think wrong!’ this is the idea of equality in jane eyre’s mind. god hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but instead, god gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. her idea of equality and self-respect impress us so much and let us feel the power inside her body.

in my mind, though a person’s beauty on the face can make others once feel that one is attractive and charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same beautiful as the appearance, such as beauty cannot last for, when others find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a falsity, it’s not true, they will like the person no more. for a long time, only a person’s great virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as an everlasting beauty, just as kahill gibran has said, that ‘beauty is a heart enflamed and a soul enchanted’。 i can feel that how beauty really is, as we are all fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but as there are great differences in our souls, and from that, we can know that whether a man is noble or ordinary, and even obscure, that is, whether he is beautiful or not.

her story makes us thinking about life and we learn much from her experience, at least, that is a fresh new recognition of the real beauty.

英文简爱读后感

this is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

it seems to me that many readers’ english reading experience starts with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we refer to the movie “jane eyer”， it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

jane eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. since jane’s education in lowwood orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. the suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, jane got a chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made the acquaintance of lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: after jane and rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally got a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, jane chose to stay with him forever.

i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard jane’s words “never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” （by forrest gump’s mother, in the film “forrest gump”）

what’s more, this film didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation? the film gives the answer tentatively: jane eventually got back to rochester. in fact, when jane met rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant rochester would get retrieval because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. after it, rochester got the mercy of the god and the love of the woman whom he loved. here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. the value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

水浒传精彩片段读后感（一）

这学期在老师的带领下，我们班阅读课共读了一本名着《水浒传》。刚听到这个消息，我心底里暗叫：不要啊！我最讨厌读关于历史以类的书了！可是老师下的命令谁感违抗？没办法，我只好听从了。

刚开始，我读起来不仅吃力，（因为是文言文版的）而且是怀着在完成作业这种心情来读的，这样读让我觉得越来越没意思，不想读了，但是老师给我们上了一节《水浒传》阅读公开课--讲的是《鲁提辖拳打镇关西》。老师生动有趣的讲解使我被鲁提辖打镇关西的场景迷住了，到家以后我跳过中间没看到的篇章直接看关于《鲁提辖拳打镇关西》这一章节，结果我被里面精彩片段描写逗得捧腹大笑。特别是其中《鲁提辖拳打镇关西》中的三拳，第一拳：“扑的只一拳，正打在鼻子上，打的鲜血迸流，鼻子歪在半边，便似开了个油酱铺，咸的、酸的、辣的一发都滚出来。”第二拳“提起拳头来就眼眶际眉梢只一拳，打得眼棱缝裂，乌珠蹦出，也似开了个彩帛铺，红的、黑的、紫的都绽将出来。”第三拳：“又只一拳，太阳上正着，却似做了一个全堂水陆的道场，磬儿、钹儿、铙儿一齐响。”写的多形象啊！把镇关西被打后的滋味写的淋漓尽致，给人以无限的遐想。

读了鲁提辖打镇关西的故事，我便觉得其实这本书还蛮有意思！便继续往后看，我发现，其实只要认真看还是能体会到名着语言的魅力。现在我已经看了一多半，而且是越看越有意思。老师为了激发我们对读《水浒传》的兴趣，又让我们组成不同的小组，来演《水浒传》里各路英雄好汉的故事，同学们演的生动极了！教室里时不时的爆出我们的喝彩声。

通过读《水浒传》我认识了惩恶扬善的“花和尚”鲁智深，还有智慧过人的“智多星”吴用，义重如山的梁山泊第一把交椅“呼保义”宋江……通过读《水浒传》这件事我还学到了做事只要坚持不半途而废，最后一定会取得成功！

水浒传精彩片段读后感（二）

7岁时，姐姐经常提起四大名着，我奇怪的问：“四大名着有什么呀？”“有《三国演义》，《水浒传》，《红楼梦》，《西游记》。”姐姐说。我心里想：《水浒传》，是不是水浒写的传吗？这个思想直到现在才明白。有一次去图书馆，我闹着说：“我要买《水浒传》！”妈妈回答到：“好！我跟你买。”虽然不是我想的那样，但也没让我失望！

《水浒传》是我国第1本用白话文写的章回小说，有108将，天罡星共36人，地煞星公72人。武松是《水浒传》中最具有英雄气概的人物之一。他在鸳鸯楼斩杀张都监后，在墙上写下“杀人者，打虎武松也。”八个大字。

现在分享一下《武松大虎》的精彩片段：

那老虎咆哮着，发起威来，翻身一扑，武松连忙一跳，退了十步远。那老虎两只前抓搭在武松前面，武松将半载棒扔了，两只手就事抓住老虎头顶的花皮，猛地按下来。老虎急着要挣扎，早没了力气，被武松死死地按住。

讲了这么久，都忘记告诉你们是谁写的啦，《水浒传》是明朝（施耐庵）写。一定要看这本书的哦！

水浒传精彩片段读后感（三）

很早就听说《水浒传》非常好看，算把《水浒》的上册啃完了。()

令我最佩服的就是作者在描写两方交战时的高超技巧。就拿杨志和索超在大名府的那场比武来说吧。不谈两人的盔甲武器，也不谈双方打斗的场面，单是两人的马，作者就写得活灵活现。索超的马“色按庚辛，仿佛南山白额虎；毛堆腻粉，如同北海玉麒麟。”而杨志的马“骏分火焰，尾摆朝霞，浑身乱扫胭脂，两耳对攒红叶。”作者观察细致入微，虽然在这里只用了比喻的手法，但在描写杨志的马时却用了四种不同的物来比喻马全身不同的红，使人觉得可信、真实，足可见作者技巧的巧妙。除了看，当然也要思考，我思来想去，就是一个问题不大清楚，那就是何为好汉？一个人的好与坏是由法律、真理来判断的，那书中所谓的好汉是以什么为标准的呢？武松，他为兄报仇，杀了嫂嫂与西门庆，那是兄弟情深，也就算了。可他血溅鸳鸯楼，把气撒到了别人身上，连在张都监家看马的也被他莫名奇妙地杀了。这看马的老头与武松无怨无仇，连面都没见几回，有什么理由杀他？就因为他帮张都监看马？武松见孔亮喝酒吃鸡，自己只有熟菜，便打跑他，自己霸占了，这也能称作好汉？想着想着，倒也想出了几分道理。以前，人们把“义”看得特别重，史进不就看在朱武和杨春重义气上，放了陈达吗？如今，做事都得依法律，如果也学他们一样，反而会害了别人。因此，时代变了，人的观念变了，我们只能用欣赏的角度去看这本书，万万不可把它当成教科书。