哈姆雷特英文读后感（一）

prince hamlet - the tragedy character of shakespeare

“to be, or not to be, that is the question”。 but after answering this question, what comes next?  to be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? and is the value precious enough for you to continue living? these are questions that can never be solved. hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the danish king. on account of hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. the uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill hamlet, indirectly killed hamlet’s beloved ophelia、ophelia’s brother and father, and hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. these tragedies finally forced hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. unfortunately, hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. it was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. for his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. but why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? is that really fair? there is no doubt that hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except hamlet was unaware of the truth. hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. so why  being sober when everybody else is drunk? why being normal when everybody else is mad? it’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. it’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “to die - to sleep! but in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? the heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. but even this does not last too long. time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. no more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair ophelia when she drowned in running stream. it’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. people never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. it’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? nothing but dust and soil. this happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.

哈姆雷特英文读后感（二）

"hamlet " of shakespear is a classical representative work. this book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable,spoke or the danish prince the story which revenged for the father,in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.just like the dramatis personae horatio said:" you may hear to to rape massacre,the unusual repair behavior,the dark center decision,accidental slaughter,borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result."

windingly elects the plot,tightly centers on the revenge to launch. hamlet wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from germany,is attends his father's funeral,enables him to accept,he not catches up with father's funeral,actually witnessed the mother and the uncle claudius' wedding ceremony， this had caused hamm the wright suspicion at the heart,added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was uncle hamlet the behavior,and wanted him to revenge for the father.to canada goose parka, he started the difficult revenge course,launched the life and death contest with claudius.finally,sent out sword the revenge to claudius

hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.()

《哈姆雷特》读后感（一）

莎士比亚的《哈姆雷特》是一部经典的代表作。讲的还是丹麦王子为父报仇的故事，其中充满了血腥暴力和死亡。正如，剧中人霍拉旭所说： 你们可以听到奸淫残杀，反常修理的行为，冥冥中的判决，意外的屠戮，借手杀人的狡计，以及陷入自害的结局。 曲折选宕的情节，紧紧围绕着复仇而展开。哈姆雷特从德国的威登堡匆匆赶回国内，是来参加他父亲的葬礼的，使他不能接受的是，他未赶上父亲的葬礼，却目睹了母亲与叔叔克劳迪斯的婚礼，这已使哈姆莱特疑窦在心，加之夜晚在王宫城堡的露台上与父亲的亡魂相见，亡魂哀诉，这桩暴行是哈姆雷特的叔叔所为，并要他为父报仇。至此，他开始了艰难的复仇历程，与克劳迪斯展开了你死我活的较量。最终，向克劳迪斯发出了复仇之剑。

《哈姆雷特》读后感（二）

鲁迅 先生说：“悲剧是将人生有价值的东西毁灭给人看。”《哈姆雷特》就是一幕极具震撼力的悲剧。哈姆雷特是勇敢的，也是不怕死的；但是，他由于敏感而犹豫不定，由于思索而拖延，精力全花费在做决定上，反而失却了行动的力量。哈姆雷特理想崇高、思想深刻，他立志重整乾坤，但他又耽于沉思、自责、自我怀疑上，加之忧郁与孤独，他迷惘、矛盾又痛苦。于是一再拖延复仇计划，导致了最后的结局。文中最令人同情的就是悲惨的配角奥菲利娅，她柔弱、沉静、腼腆又天真无邪。可她那脆弱的身心被爱和恨一起挤压着、煎熬着。她不幸、痛苦、无助，却都逆来顺受地忍受了它，最终还是迷失了自己，离开了自己。“生存还是毁灭？是默默忍受命运的暴虐，或是挺身反抗人世无涯的苦难，通过斗争把它们扫清，这两种行为，哪一种更高贵？”这峨我不知道，似乎也不是那么容易分得清的事情，只是哈姆雷特选择了后者，承担起了那项他承担不起，几乎连渺茫的希望都没有、但又决不可推卸的复仇重任。如今的现实中，倘若我们遇到了困难，我们是去面对它，还是选择逃避？我想应该是面对。无论是什么困难，没有人解决不了的，除了死亡。可是就算在死亡面前，如果能勇敢的接受，那么也算的上高贵了。总而言之，不论在什么艰难险阻面前，我们都应该勇敢面对，接受挑战。

《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主义思想家的悲剧。在《哈姆雷特》中，莎士比亚曾借人物之口表达自己的戏剧主张："自有戏剧以来，它的目的始终是反映自然，显示善恶的本来面目，给它的时代看一看演变发展的模型。"悲剧《哈姆雷特》正是剧作家这种现实主义戏剧观的生动体现。

哈姆雷特是悲剧的中心人物。他是一个典型的人文主义者。人文主义思想是文艺复兴时期文学的核心，它体现了新兴资产阶级的世界观，是资产阶级与封建贵族、教会进行斗争的武器。人文主义着反对以神为中心的封建神学，宣传人是宇宙的主宰，是万物之本。哈姆雷特对世界和人类抱有巨大的热情和美好的希望。他说："人是多么了不起的一件物品！理性是多么高贵！力量是多么无穷！行动多么像天使！了解多么像天神！宇宙的精华！万物的灵长！"他肯定人的现实生活，渴望纯洁的友情和真挚的爱情。他聪明热情、敏感善思、能文能武。他的恋人峨菲利亚说："啊，一颗多么高贵的心就是这样陨落了！"这样的王子自然得到民众的拥护，连他的敌人克劳迪斯也承认："他是为糊涂的群众所喜爱的"。可是他一接触社会的现实，他所崇拜的父王突然死去，而自己所爱的母亲连为丈夫送葬的鞋子都没有穿旧，就匆忙嫁给了从前受人耻笑的克劳迪斯。他感到忧郁："人世间的一切在我看来是多么可厌、陈腐、乏味而无聊！"经过一番深沉的思考，把个人问题与整个社会联系起来，发现"时代一切都脱节了"，"丹麦是一座监狱"，"我决心担负起重整乾坤的责任"。这样为父报仇实际上成了改造社会的一个具体行动。他有意安排了"戏中戏"以便进一步证实奸王的罪行。当罪行的真-相确证以后，便立即行动。但为了寻找正义的手段，他放弃了在奸王祈祷把他杀死的机会，接着又误杀了波洛涅斯，这样就招来被放逐的命令。最后，他虽然逃了回来，在决斗中杀死了奸王，自己也因中了毒剑而牺牲，"重整乾坤"的责任也落空了。

《哈姆雷特》在艺术上也能集中体现作者的创作特色。剧作的生活画面广阔，情节的展开生动、丰富。剧作所反映的生活画面，从皇宫到家庭，从深闺到墓地，从军士守卫到民众造反，从剧场到比剑场，构成了剧中人物活动的广阔的背景。莎士比亚非常注重情节的安排，一波未平，一波又起。除复仇的情节之外，还配合诸如爱情、友情、亲子关系等，对情节的发展起了推动的作用。与情节的生动性和丰富性相联系，作者还组织了丰富多彩的戏剧场面。如"戏中戏"演出的那一场，是一场重点戏，又是过渡戏，是哈姆雷特的思想和行动的转折点。

莎士比亚是语言大师。他的戏剧语言丰富多彩，富有诗意。他的剧作主要是用自由的无韵诗体写成，还有民间歌谣，其人物的语言也变化多端。

刻画哈姆雷特时，多次运用独白，诗体与散文交相使用，哲理与抒情相结合，具有强烈的艺术感染力。

《哈姆雷特》是一部巨作，它给我很多很多，值得一看！

《哈姆雷特》读后感（三）

以前，常听人说《哈姆雷特》是一部优秀的作品。我没有亲见，自然也无从说起。如今，我读了一遍，心中颇有一番感慨。伴随着淡淡的悲伤，哈姆雷特本性之善、意志之坚、复仇的愿望之切等特点，无不在我的脑海中浮现。我觉得，哈姆雷特是一个真正的英雄，他的灵魂也因他的英雄举动走得远于他人。

最初，哈姆雷特是天真的、单纯的，也是幸福的，他对未来充满美好的希望。后来，父亲的暴死、母亲的改嫁，让他觉得一切都天翻地覆了，于是，他失望、孤寂，又开始忧郁了，他无目的地活着。

恰在此时，鬼魂告诉了他真相，于是，哈姆雷特愤怒了，他也开始觉悟了，他要报仇。

哈姆雷特凭着自己的智慧，验证了事情的真实性之后，他开始平静下来，他沉思着，自己是否应该担起重任。那时，他的灵魂却没有停下来等待，仍在前进。最终，哈姆雷特做出了决断，他放弃了安逸的生活，放弃了自己的爱情，放弃了……只是他却没有料到克劳狄斯的阴谋，不过，他毕竟在临死前也给了敌人致命的一击。他虽然没有完成自己的使命，他却为实现自己的理想铺平了道路。此时，哈姆雷特的灵魂走得更远了，直到消失在那条通往天堂的大道上，好一个走远的灵魂！

哈姆雷特是英雄，他是人，()而不是神，他也有人性和情爱。正因为如此，他能对母亲发出心底的愤怒，面对奥菲利娅的死，他悲痛欲绝，而当他面对自己的仇人、国家的仇人时，善良的本性又使他犹豫不决、迟迟不愿行动。如今读来，我仍能感受到他当时内心的矛盾和痛苦的挣扎。什么才是英雄？我认为，这才是真正的英雄。

莎翁的过人之处，在于他摆脱了古人将英雄神化的写法，他写活了哈姆雷特。这个人物感动了读者，让人觉得，仿佛真有这样的一个人站在我们的面前。读罢此剧，我的心里再也不能平静了，胸中掀起的激情使我发出了来自内心的感叹：哈姆雷特，我为你喝彩。

哈姆雷特的读后感（一）

《哈姆雷特》这本书，叙述的是一个“王子复仇记”，是莎翁的着名悲剧之一，爱与恨的纠缠时刻让人揪紧了心，从哈姆雷特在痛苦中的经典独白中我看出哈姆雷特对人生的思考，从他的行动中我看出哈姆雷特对人生的追求。总之，这本书让我受益颇多。

初读《哈姆雷特》，我印象中最深的除了哈姆雷特外就数普隆涅斯——莪菲利霞的父亲，他的性格很自以为是，还很爱拍马屁，正如哈姆雷特所说：一个讨厌的老傻瓜，但他在儿子勒替斯走时的一段叮嘱却给了我很深的印象，他说：“不要想到什么就说什么，凡事必须三思而后行，对人要和气，但是不要过分狎昵。相知有素的朋友，应用钢圈箍在你的灵魂上，但是不要对每一个泛泛的新知滥施你的交情。留心避免和他人争吵，但是万一争端已起，就应该让对方知道你不是可以轻侮的。倾听每一个人意见，但是只对极少数人发表你的意见，接受每一个人的批评，但是保留你自己的判断。尽你的财力购置贵重的衣服，但是不要炫新立异，必须富丽而不浮艳，因为服装往往可以表现人格，法国的名流要人，在这一点上是特别注重的，不要向人告贷，也不要借施钱给人，因为债和款放了出去，往往不但丢了本钱，也失去了朋友，向人告贷的结果，容易养成因循懒惰的习惯。尤其要紧的，你必须对自己忠实，正想有了白昼才有黑夜一样，对自己忠实，才不会对别人欺诈。”我虽然对这不全赞同，但他的这番话给了我不小的启示，我在今后的生活道路上，应该谨记这些有益的教诲，不断完善自己。

接着，在介绍一下美丽的莪菲利霞，她美丽而且圣洁，却沦为恶人的工具，但我想她是一个没有自信的人，她爱哈姆雷特，可有被哈姆雷特的地位所困扰，她认为地位变了，爱情就靠不住，她被封建思想所束缚，她和充满自由思想的哈姆雷特并不相配。倘若他们在一起的话，必然会有很多的冲突。而且，莪菲利霞也不是一个特别有自制力的人，她真疯时的表现，让我对她先前的一切美好表示怀疑，她先前所做的一切不过是为了掩饰她的灵魂……

现在我想大致介绍我眼中的哈姆雷特，“一千个人眼中有一千个哈姆雷特”，我眼中的哈姆雷特是一个特别机智而且正直的人。他的思想不拘泥于他所处时代的主流，他热爱思考，对生活充满了希望，当他得知他的父亲死于克劳迪斯的谋杀，他虽无力回天，但他为了证实这件事，他导演了一出戏剧证实了这一点。他善待那些表演的伶人，并不因他们身份地位就瞧不起他们。哈姆雷特对好朋友霍拉旭特别真诚，哈姆雷特曾对他这样说过：“霍拉旭，你是我交往的人中最正直的一位……因为你虽然经历一切颠沛，却不曾受到一点伤害，命运的虐待和恩宠，对于你都是一样，能够把感情和理智调整的那么适当，命运不能把你玩弄于指掌之间……”我从中看出了哈姆雷特是一个特别有感情和理智的人，也从中看出了哈姆雷特对朋友的赞赏。哈姆雷特的经典独白中有一句话“……默然忍受命运的暴虐的毒箭，或是挺身反抗人世的无涯的苦难，在奋斗中结束了一切，这两种行为，哪一种是更勇敢的？”他用他的自身行动告诉了我们答案。

还有一个细节，我觉得特别不可思议，就是哈姆雷特没有杀害在做祷告的克劳迪斯，他认为这样会然他上天堂。但我想，这样一个十恶不赦的人，死后必定会下地狱吧，他诡诈又阴险而且两面三刀“败坏伦常，嗜杀成性”，真是死不足惜！

看完《哈姆雷特》最大遗憾就在于自己不精通英语，因为不论是什么版本的翻译，我想比起原着，终要黯然失色。真希望自己有一天能领略原版的风采！

哈姆雷特的读后感（二）

《哈姆雷特》是莎士比亚最著名的—部悲剧，它突出地反映了作者的人文主义思想。莎士比亚说过，他的作品就是“给自然照一面镜子，给德行看一看自己的面目，给荒唐看一看自己的姿态，给时代和社会看一看自己的形象和印记”。《哈姆雷特》正是一个时代的缩影。

哈姆雷特是文艺复兴时期人文主义者的理想人物。他是王子，按照传统，是王权的当然继承者。但是，他的美好前途被颠倒了的时代颠倒了。戏一开头，作者就展现了一幅丑恶的社会画面：国家发生宫廷政变，国王被害，阴谋家窃取了王位；王后改嫁；满朝臣子趋炎附势等等。世界仿佛到了末日。于是这个王子喊出了“时代整个儿脱节了”的吼声。人们强烈地感受到这是“时代的灵魂”本身在呼喊。哈姆雷特本是个正直、乐观、有理想的青年，在正常的环境下，他可以成为一位贤明君主；但是现实的社会迫使他不得不装疯卖傻，进行复仇。他是英国那个特定的动荡不安时代的产物。

在《哈姆雷特》这部戏剧中，处处可以看出作者着意把自己心目中的典型人物塑造成一个英雄形象的匠心：哈姆雷特很有心计，在敌强我弱的恶劣情况下，他敢于针锋相对地进行斗争，他击破了奸王设下的—个个圈套：先是戳穿了波洛涅斯和罗森克兰等人进行刺探和监视的把戏；又使王后发现天良；接着采用“调包计”除掉了奸王的两个走卒，把奸王“借刀杀人”的阴谋击得粉碎；最后“以其人之道还治其人之身”，把双重陷阱——毒剑和毒酒还给了奸王。在每一回合的斗争中，哈姆雷特都显得形象高大。所以有评论说，《哈姆雷特》是一出“巨人型”的悲剧，此话不无道理。

但哈姆雷特决非“完人”。他虽然善于思索，却优柔寡断；他虽然受到人民的爱戴，却并不相信人民。他说：“时代变得越发不像样子，—个农民的脚趾竟然这么靠近一个朝臣的脚后跟，擦伤了后者的冻疮。”可见哈姆雷特的社会改革与农民所要求的变革相距甚远。尽管哈姆雷特有令人钦佩的才能，竭力想除旧布新，但他总是郁郁不乐，迟疑不决，他始终是孤立的。这就注定了他与丑恶同归于尽的悲惨命运。

《哈姆雷特》描写人物心理的语言十分丰富，这在莎士比亚所有悲剧中也是十分突出的。如哈姆雷特的性格大部分是以“疯话”表达出来的，他的“满口荒唐言”就像迸发出来的火花。克劳迪斯阴阳怪气的语言则照映出了他口蜜腹剑的丑态。波洛涅斯爱用诗体语言，给人以滑稽可笑的印象。

因为它谈到了人生的抉择，谈到了一个生活在特定的历史与生活环境下的人在对他个人来言是独特的，而对于全人类来说又是普遍的的命运面前，在只有从过去所积累的有限的经验可以凭借与依托的情况下，所选择的人生之路。从某种意义上说，他的经验也代表了我们自己的经验，他所面对的命运在我们人生的某个阶段里也是我们所要面对的。我们面对绝望的存在，在矛盾中摸索真理，在迷雾中找寻真相，在两难问题里作出行动，在一个失去标准与可以衡量标准的尺度的世界里重建价值的体系与精神大厦……

哈姆雷特是不完美的，有时他的抉择是非理性的，相当冲动的，比如当他在激怒之下一剑刺死他误以为是国王的波洛涅斯时，然而或许正是他这种不理智的抉择，这种人性的弱点的表现，让我们打心底里接受和认同他的艺术形象，因为我们常常可以在自己身上看见他的影子……

总之，《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主义思想家的悲剧，是欧洲文艺复兴土壤里长出来的一朵长开不败的艺术之花，直至今天，还在散发出它所特有的馨香。

哈姆雷特的读后感（三）

鲁迅先生说：“悲剧是将人生有价值的东西毁灭给人看。”《哈姆雷特》就是一幕极具震撼力的悲剧。哈姆雷特是勇敢的，也是不怕死的；但是，他由于敏感而犹豫不定，由于思索而拖延，精力全花费在做决定上，反而失却了行动的力量。哈姆雷特理想崇高、思想深刻，他立志重整乾坤，但他又耽于沉思、自责、自我怀疑上，加之忧郁与孤独，他迷惘、矛盾又痛苦。于是一再拖延复仇计划，导致了最后的结局。文中最令人同情的就是悲惨的配角奥菲利娅，她柔弱、沉静、腼腆又天真无邪。可她那脆弱的身心被爱和恨一起挤压着、煎熬着。她不幸、痛苦、无助，却都逆来顺受地忍受了它，最终还是迷失了自己，离开了自己。“生存还是毁灭？是默默忍受命运的暴虐，或是挺身反抗人世无涯的苦难，通过斗争把它们扫清，这两种行为，哪一种更高贵？”这峨我不知道，似乎也不是那么容易分得清的事情，只是哈姆雷特选择了后者，承担起了那项他承担不起，几乎连渺茫的希望都没有、但又决不可推卸的复仇重任。如今的现实中，倘若我们遇到了困难，我们是去面对它，还是选择逃避？我想应该是面对。无论是什么困难，没有人解决不了的，除了死亡。可是就算在死亡面前，如果能勇敢的接受，那么也算的上高贵了。总而言之，不论在什么艰难险阻面前，我们都应该勇敢面对，接受挑战。

《哈姆雷特》是一出人文主义思想家的悲剧。在《哈姆雷特》中，莎士比亚曾借人物之口表达自己的戏剧主张："自有戏剧以来，它的目的始终是反映自然，显示善恶的本来面目，给它的时代看一看演变发展的模型。"悲剧《哈姆雷特》正是剧作家这种现实主义戏剧观的生动体现。

哈姆雷特是悲剧的中心人物。他是一个典型的人文主义者。人文主义思想是文艺复兴时期文学的核心，它体现了新兴资产阶级的世界观，是资产阶级与封建贵族、教会进行斗争的武器。人文主义着反对以神为中心的封建神学，宣传人是宇宙的主宰，是万物之本。哈姆雷特对世界和人类抱有巨大的热情和美好的希望。他说："人是多么了不起的一件物品！理性是多么高贵！力量是多么无穷！行动多么像天使！了解多么像天神！宇宙的精华！万物的灵长！"他肯定人的现实生活，渴望纯洁的友情和真挚的爱情。他聪明热情、敏感善思、能文能武。他的恋人峨菲利亚说："啊，一颗多么高贵的心就是这样陨落了！"这样的王子自然得到民众的拥护，连他的敌人克劳迪斯也承认："他是为糊涂的群众所喜爱的"。可是他一接触社会的现实，他所崇拜的父王突然死去，而自己所爱的母亲连为丈夫送葬的鞋子都没有穿旧，就匆忙嫁给了从前受人耻笑的克劳迪斯。他感到忧郁："人世间的一切在我看来是多么可厌、陈腐、乏味而无聊！"经过一番深沉的思考，把个人问题与整个社会联系起来，发现"时代一切都脱节了"，"丹麦是一座监狱"，"我决心担负起重整乾坤的责任"。这样为父报仇实际上成了改造社会的一个具体行动。他有意安排了"戏中戏"以便进一步证实奸王的罪行。当罪行的真-相确证以后，便立即行动。但为了寻找正义的手段，他放弃了在奸王祈祷把他杀死的机会，接着又误杀了波洛涅斯，这样就招来被放逐的命令。最后，他虽然逃了回来，在决斗中杀死了奸王，自己也因中了毒剑而牺牲，"重整乾坤"的责任也落空了。()

《哈姆雷特》在艺术上也能集中体现作者的创作特色。剧作的生活画面广阔，情节的展开生动、丰富。剧作所反映的生活画面，从皇宫到家庭，从深闺到墓地，从军士守卫到民众造反，从剧场到比剑场，构成了剧中人物活动的广阔的背景。莎士比亚非常注重情节的安排，一波未平，一波又起。除复仇的情节之外，还配合诸如爱情、友情、亲子关系等，对情节的发展起了推动的作用。与情节的生动性和丰富性相联系，作者还组织了丰富多彩的戏剧场面。如"戏中戏"演出的那一场，是一场重点戏，又是过渡戏，是哈姆雷特的思想和行动的转折点。

莎士比亚是语言大师。他的戏剧语言丰富多彩，富有诗意。他的剧作主要是用自由的无韵诗体写成，还有民间歌谣，其人物的语言也变化多端。

刻画哈姆雷特时，多次运用独白，诗体与散文交相使用，哲理与抒情相结合，具有强烈的艺术感染力。

《哈姆雷特》是一部巨作，它给我很多很多，值得一看！

哈姆雷特读后感英文（一）

created in 1600 —— 1601 hamlet had been admired for centuries. is to at the moment, still feel his vocal. and all this is not the plot, also not only only is excellent literary technique, it is reflected by the problem. in general,

it describes a kind of extremely primitive, people.

the hero hamlet first dealing with your original ideal world. at the start of the benefits in some hamlet "childhood", he did you experience any huge setback, living environment is more simple, always learning western orthodoxy. but in the end, noble, to adore the father died, less than a month is virtuous mother remarried his uncle to usurp the throne. this made him wonder in the world. and after this doubt directly contributed to his hesitation. he realized that they are not perfect it, chastity but desire, moral victory over greed. he thinks you should go to revenge, but the moral person is his mother; his uncle killed his father and he is a person, is a person's thoughts. but even if revenge success, again how? he said: "to be or not to be, this is a question worth thinking about" life is a pain, but the fear of death and have less absolute. he met a problem, can't answer is unavoidable.

hamlet's situation is not the only, the life of big hands to hold each one is so tight.()

the old king's death, which are not related and queen. but as a woman she faces two kinds of selection, it is moral or desire. she chose the latter. however she scorned by the hamlet and criticism, moral emptiness has brought her considerable pain, in fact, the queen is a kind person, she is not morally repugnant. she is to choose what kind of misfortune, not in the selection of your own destiny.

the new king, the uncle usurped the throne, he is the biggest villain in the play leading role. he wanted to the throne, and to the queen with desire. but the king was others. is his brother, he don't deserve the throne. he, like all of the faces the loss of the ideal world in my heart. but he strenuously to win, but at the moment, he was a hero general spirit, he bravely to fight for originally do not belong to own. but it is also the tragedy. he paid the price, his hands stained with the blood of others, cannot repent. in later, he found hamlet after knowing the truth, he began to save themselves may lose the happiness of life. he hovered between sin and rational, in the end he didn't jump out, died in his own sword.

le for, and the fate of me mr li chardonnay with hamlet striking similarities. in selection of to be or not to be, i am mr li xia chose the latter, she chose to suicide. in the selection of revenge or not, le for hamlet is completely opposite the avengers, "so am i a noble father die in vain, so a good younger sister just this go crazy?… my revenge chance will come one day." in revenge and "inevitable" death on this matter, all of the selected point to the same destination.

unlike hamlet's stagnant, others struggle for action. new killed the old king, the king and tried to confess to clear their iniquity, and to attempt to kill hamlet through to keep the throne. le for and implement the plan together, in an attempt to let hamlet to pay for his father's death. but in the end? the new king was dead, he might say the revenge. le for dead, plan to fail. hamlet died on the others for his revenge. ……

someone said that the story of hamlet is too far-fetched, how could all die. but that is precisely the reality. the article shows a group of people who fight against the fate to us of the final end. they try to change your fate, as a result, what also have no save. they try to restore the past, what the result. this kind of helpless, depends on each person, perhaps the biggest misfortune is man himself. "hamlet" type of glass with each and every one, every aspect, and all the time.

such thing as fate is a kind of existence, how he would like a shadow, and we was like peas and carrots, like sunshine and warm the heart, but more often, deep and terrible like a nightmare. "the will of god dominate everything", this sentence, there is no doubt quite penetrating.

哈姆雷特读后感英文（二）

“to be, or not to be, that is the question”。 but after answering this question, what comes next? to be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? and is the value precious enough for you to continue living? these are questions that can never be solved. hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the danish king. on account of hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. the uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill hamlet, indirectly killed hamlet’s beloved ophelia 、 ophelia’s brother and father, and hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. these tragedies finally forced hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. unfortunately, hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. it was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. for his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. but why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? is that really fair? there is no doubt that hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except hamlet was unaware of the truth. hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. so why being sober when everybody else is drunk? why being normal when everybody else is mad? it’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. it’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “to die - to sleep! but in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? the heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. but even this does not last too long. time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. no more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair ophelia when she drowned in running stream. it’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. people never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. it’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? nothing but dust and soil. this happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.

哈姆雷特读后感英文（三）

were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be hamlet.

among all the masterpieces of william shakespeare, “hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.

to have read shakespeare's “romeo and juliet” by the age of 16, i was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “tempest”。 presumably when i get 60 or older, i could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. but it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. this is because it highlights hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. that is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.

we're possibly the same. we explore the truth in the dark. we discover facts from the mist. we lose ourselves in determinations. we trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.

hamlet couldn't have been perfect. he is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. but somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his weakness of humanity, that hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.

hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the danish court. and although it costs him his life, he succeeds.

at some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “no!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. william shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.

i hear hamlet thinking, “too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. it's a bad world, and i am far from a perfect human being. we all end up dead in the end. so i am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”()

i hear him wondering, “what is a man, if his chief good and market of his time. is but to sleep and feed? a beast, no more.”

i hear him whispering “to be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. to die, to sleep, is that all? aye, all.”

that makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. thousands of readers may have thousands of their own hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. that's his quest.

thinks about it.